Legal Opinion

Kiefer v. City of Idaho Falls

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1930No. 5350PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, C. J.

Appellants contest as discriminatory, unreasonable and inequitable the rates fixed by the city council for electricity supplied by the municipally owned hydroelectric light and power plant of the city of Idaho Falls. The trial court found that the rate for water heating and the discount allowed hospitals were discriminatory and the same therefore need not be further considered. The rates in dispute are for commercial lighting, commercial power and sign lighting, domestic lighting, domestic power, domestic combination, and irrigation power.

C. S., see. 3971, as amended 1927 Sess. Laws, 262,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. State v. JohnstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Springfield Gas & Electric Co. v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Call Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Feil v. City of Coeur D'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1912

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. San Antonio Independent School District v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Schenker v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Durant v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Agricultural Products Corp. v. Utah Power & Light Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API