Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. City of Wichita

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 27, 2000No. 83,227PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

This is a class action suit brought by plaintiffs David Mitchell and Nolan O. Luke challenging the authority of the defendant City of Wichita, Kansas, (City) to charge users of its water and sewer utility who live outside the city limits a fee for water and sewer service which is 55% higher than the fee charged the users within the city limits. The plaintiffs’ challenge is to both the authority of the City to impose such a surcharge and to the reasonableness of the City’s 55% surcharge.

The plaintiffs and the City filed motions for summary…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. National CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Bergstrom v. NoahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  3. American Aniline Products, Inc. v. Lock HavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Durant v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Tillotson v. AbbottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. ONEOK Field Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. Burcham v. Unison Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. SHAMBERG, JOHNSON & BERGMAN v. OliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API