Gee v. McMillan
Oregon Supreme Court
Multnomah County. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.
The object of this suit is to enforce a grantor’s lien upon certain real property situate in Multnomah County. The material parts of the complaint are as follows: That the defendant Sarah McMillan is the wife of the defendant R. II. McMillan, and the defendant Mary Ilaugg is the wife of the defendant N. TIaugg; that on.the 18th day of December, 1885, the plaintiff was the owner of an undivided interest in and to the said property described in the complaint, and was also the owner of an undivided interest in and to certain personal property in the complaint described, and that the legal title…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peters v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Ahrend v. OdiorneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Thredgill v. PintardSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Coos Bay Wagon Co. v. CrockerUnited States Circuit Court · 1880
- Pease v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by7 opinions
- Farleigh v. KelleyMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- Bair v. StruckMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- First Nat. Bank of Salem v. Salem Capital Flour-Mills Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1889
- Rogers v. CrockettIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Frame v. SliterOregon Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.