Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Salem v. Salem Capital Flour-Mills Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon

Decided June 17, 1889PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Suit to Foreclose the Lien of a Mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.

This suit is brought by the First National Bank of Salem, hereafter called herein the “Salem Bank,” to enforce the lien of a mortgage given by the Salem (Oregon) Capital Flour-Mills Company, hereafter called herein the “Scotch Company,” to secure the payment of its note for $80,000.

William Stuart, who held a prior mortgage on the same property, executed by the City of Salem Company, hereafter called herein the “Oregon Company,” to secure the payment of $71,940, with interest, was made defendant. Ho appeared, and filed a cross-bill, in which he admitted the claim of the plaintiff, and asked to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clapp v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Dupee v. Boston Water Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Coos Bay Wagon Co. v. CrockerUnited States Circuit Court · 1880
  4. Gee v. McMillanOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  5. In re Republic Ins.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1873

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burnes v. BurnesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Mannington v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1910
  3. Atlanta & Walworth Butter & Cheese Ass'n v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Coleman v. TepelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
  5. Copper Belle Mining Co. v. CostelloArizona Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API