Legal Opinion

Steinhebel v. Los Angeles Times Communications

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 2005No. B172415PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLIER, J.

Appellants, Kurt Steinhebel et al., former “telesales” employees of respondent Los Angeles Times Communications LLC, appeal from a summary judgment issued on the ground it was lawful for respondent to contract with such employees to pay a commission upon the sale of a subscription immediately, subject to a charge-back if the customer did not keep the subscription for at least 28 days.

After reviewing pertinent law, we conclude that respondent’s charge-back policy does not violate the Labor Code and thus is lawful. We accordingly affirm the judgment of the trial court.

FACTS

Respon…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Olszewski v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Kerr's Catering Service v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Barnhill v. Robert Saunders & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Hudgins v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Louis v. McCormick & Schmick Restaurant Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
  3. Prachasaisoradej v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Koehl v. Verio, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. DeLeon v. Verizon Wireless, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API