Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ogle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 20, 1945No. 31832PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

Ogle as plaintiff sought recovery under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U. S. C. A. §§ 201-219, for alleged overtime employment cf some 2,700 hours at the overtime rate of $1.30 per hour. He alleged that he had performed such overtime work between October 1, 1938, to February 1, 1941. He sought judgment for $3,-662.50, and attorney’s fees. He obtained verdict and judgment for $1,775-04. and the court allowed attorney’s fee of $300.

For reversal defendants urge four propositions. First it is argued that defendants’ demurrers to plaintiff’s evidence should have been sustained.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  3. Cummings v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Meshek v. CordesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Methvin v. MethvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Grider v. USX Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Morris v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. McAlester Urban Renewal Authority v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. City of Lawton v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API