Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. R. v. Turner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 23, 1952No. 34855PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover damages for the value of growing crops allegedly lost by reason of defendant’s negligent construction and maintenance of its railroad across his land, thereby preventing the natural drainage of the surface water and thus causing damages for which plaintiff sought recovery.

The pertinent facts may be summarized as follows: Plaintiff owned 80 acres of land in Canadian county, traversed from northwest to southeast by defendant’s railroad. Seventy-two acres of the land had been planted to alfalfa, a perennial crop, and 1 % acres to wheat. In 1949, the year involved, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Box Co. v. BradleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Schneider v. BerryMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Crow v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Franklin Drilling Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Poteete v. City of Water ValleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ratton v. BusbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  2. Burke v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Wilcox Oil Company v. LawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Black v. EllithorpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Death of Lofton v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API