Legal Opinion
Rediker v. Warfield
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 15, 1951PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff has served interrogatories upon defendants Warfield and Scott requiring answers as to conversations with or communications from any representative of the defendant International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (hereinafter called “Bank”) concerning plaintiff’s activities with respect to Ulen Realization Corporation (hereinafter called “Ulen”) and the Government of Iran.
*127The action is brought against the defendants for conspiring to cause Ulen to breach and repudiate an agreement whereby plaintiff was engaged by Ulen to collect its claim against the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Rosseau v. . BleauNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Baumann v. . SteingesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Wild v. PaysonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated November 16, 1974District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1979
- Transmirra Products Corp. v. Monsanto Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.