Legal Opinion
37 Huntington Street v. City of Hartford
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 3, 2001No. AC 20522PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
The dispositive issue in this case is whether 12 U.S.C. § 1825 (b)1 entitles an owner of real property to immunity from municipal tax liens for the period of time during which the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)2 held a security interest in the property. This is an issue of federal law that comes to this court as a matter of first impression. The trial court adjudged the municipal tax hens to be valid and enforceable despite the FDIC’s mortgage. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff, 37 Huntington Street, H, LLC (landowner), brought this…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- City of New Brunswick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Amodio v. AmodioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Rtc Commercial Assets Trust 1995-Np3-1, a Delaware Business Trust v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Serrani v. Board of EthicsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Batte-Holmgren v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Berlin Batting Cages, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Kalas v. CookConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Jobe v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- 37 Huntington Street, H, LLC v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.