Legal Opinion
Dorbest Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 7, 2009No. Consol. 05-00003PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POGUE, Judge.
This matter returns to court after a second partial remand following the court’s most recent decision, Dorbest Ltd. v. United States, 547 F.Supp.2d 1321 (CIT 2008) (“Dorbest II ”). Dorbest II remanded the matter to the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) so that it could: (1) determine the correct heading of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of India (“HTS[I]”) for the valuation of Dorbest’s cardboard input, id. at 1337, (2) provide adequate support or explanation for its selection of surrogate companies for use in the calculation of SG & A financial ratios, id. at 1344, (3) explain…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Huaiyin Foreign Trade Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Calgon Carbon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010