Legal Opinion
Dorbest Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 27, 2008No. Slip-Op. 08-24. Court No. 05-00003PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POGUE, Judge.
This matter is before the court following partial remand. In its prior opinion, the court reviewed the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce’s”) affirmative less •than fair value determination for subject merchandise and the antidumping duty order and dumping margins subsequently imposed. Dorbest Ltd. v. United States, — CIT—, 462 F.Supp.2d 1262 (2006) (“Dorbest ”); 1 see also, Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China, 69 Fed.Reg. 67, 313, 67, 317 (Dep’t Commerce Nov. 17, 2004)(final determination of sales at less than fair value)(“Fmai Results ”) amended by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- SKF USA Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Coalition for the Preservation of American Brake Drum & Rotor Aftermarket Manufacturers v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- International Fidelity Insurance v. Sweet Little Mexico Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Home Products International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Jinan Yipin Corp. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Allied Pacific Food (Dalian) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.