Legal Opinion
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Henney
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2000No. 1:99-cv-00862PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
ORDERING CONSOLIDATION OF CASES; DENYING MYLAN’S AND PHARMACHEMIE’S MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; DENYING MYLAN’S AND PHARMA-CHEMIE’S MOTIONS TO INTERVENE; REMANDING TO FDA FOR PERMISSIBLE INTERPRETATION OF 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(5)(B)(iv) AND REGULATION 314.94(a)(12)(viii)
I. INTRODUCTION
Pharmachemie, B.V. (“Pharmachemie”) and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“My-lan”), genei'ic manufacturers of the drug tamoxifen (together, the “Parties”), bring separate actions against Defendant Jane E. Henney, M.D., in her official capacity as Commissioner of the United…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Joblove v. Barr Labs. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Pharmachemie B.V. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- In Re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- In Re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Individual Reference Services Group, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.