Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Jarvis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

This is an action at law tried before the court without a jury. Judgment was entered for plaintiff. Defendants Frank Jarvis and Adelia Jarvis appeal.

The action is based upon a promissory note given by one Cameron in payment of a commission for the sale of real estate. The appellants executed the note for a valuable consideration. This appeal is presented upon the proposition that the appellants should be granted a judgment on the findings of fact entered in the lower court.

The findings of fact do not warrant a judgment in favor of said appellants. The substantive law of this case is governed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norman v. MeekerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State Ex Rel. Oatey Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Jennings v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Vickerman v. KappWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Kennery v. Northwestern Junk Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shaver Forwarding Co. v. Eagle Star InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. James R. Yost v. Alberta G. MorrowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API