Legal Opinion

State v. Vadnais

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 29, 1996No. 94-578PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brock C.J.

The defendant, Leo Vadnais, appeals the Superior Court {Barry, J.) denial of his motion to suppress the fruits of what he claims was an unlawful seizure. On appeal, he argues that the police officer who stopped him did not have sufficient specific and articulable facts to warrant an investigatory stop under part I, article 19 of the New Hampshire Constitution and the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution. We affirm.

At 1:15 a.m. on May 21, 1998, Manchester Police Officers Robert Oxley and George Baker saw the defendant emerge from 184 Cedar Street. The officers knew that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. People v. AldridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Duhart v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. KoppelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. McKinnon-AndrewsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  2. State v. WallaceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. State v. WebberSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  4. State v. WigginSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API