Legal Opinion

Duhart v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1991No. 89-472PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Chief Judge:

Appellant Reginald K. Duhart appeals from his convictions on the ground that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress since the police lacked articulable suspicion justifying his seizure and frisk. We agree, concluding that the en banc decision in Smith v. United States, 558 A.2d 312 (D.C.1989) (en banc), is dispositive, and accordingly reverse.

I

On September 28, 1988 at approximately 7:25 p.m., Sergeant Tompkins of the Third District tactical unit, in uniform, was riding his scooter the wrong way down the 1400 block of Fairmont Street, N.W., when he observed…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. State v. NettlesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  2. State v. HarringtonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. HarringtonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Umanzor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API