Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 6, 2007No. 2005-796PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

The defendant, Sean Brown, appeals his conviction for hindering apprehension under RSA 642:3,1(a) (1996), following a jury trial in Superior Court (Groff, J.). He argues that the trial court improperly expanded the statutory definition of the crime when it responded to a jury question and erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.

The record supports the following. On May 25, 2004, the Nashua Police Department was informed of a robbery allegedly committed by two males. One of the alleged perpetrators was described as a Hispanic male wearing a blue bandana. The two suspects left the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. State v. Wayne KelleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. State v. BeauchesneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  5. State v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. State v. JoyceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  3. State v. SteevesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  4. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  5. State v. TarasuikSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API