State v. Brown
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The defendant, Sean Brown, appeals his conviction for hindering apprehension under RSA 642:3,1(a) (1996), following a jury trial in Superior Court (Groff, J.). He argues that the trial court improperly expanded the statutory definition of the crime when it responded to a jury question and erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.
The record supports the following. On May 25, 2004, the Nashua Police Department was informed of a robbery allegedly committed by two males. One of the alleged perpetrators was described as a Hispanic male wearing a blue bandana. The two suspects left the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. Wayne KelleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- State v. BeauchesneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- State v. JoyceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. SteevesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- State v. TarasuikSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.