Legal Opinion

Yusky v. Chief Consol. Mining Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1925No. 4199PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Salt Lake county October 30, 1922, to recover damages for alleged wrongs committed by defendant, by which it is claimed plaintiffs were deprived of the benefits of a certain lease upon mining property situated in Juab county, Utah. Divers motions and demurrers were filed by defendant and amendments to pleadings allowed by the court, none of which, however, are material on this appeal, except the amended answer of defendant and plaintiffs’ reply thereto. The amended answer set up as an affirmative defense that there was another action pending…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Montana Central Railway Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Kaufman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Robinson v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Boyd v. SteeleIdaho Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Lukich v. Utah Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Faber v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Workman v. Nagle Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  3. Nu-Med USA, Inc. v. 4Life Research, L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State Ex Rel. Tibbals v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Molen v. Denning & Clark Livestock Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API