Legal Opinion

Workman v. Nagle Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 30, 1990No. 890388-CAPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONDER, Judge:

Defendant Marilyn Nagle appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to set aside a judgment. We reverse.

The Utah Division of Consumer Protection (Division) initiated this action as plaintiff under the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act, title 13, chapter 11 of the Utah Code, alleging misconduct by the defendants in the sale of certain condominiums. This action alleges only civil, not criminal claims, and the Division acted on behalf of what it alleged was a class consisting of the buyers of the condominiums in question. The district court granted summary judgment in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Samuel J. Jordon v. John J. GilliganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  3. Aguchak v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Brinkerhoff v. ForsythUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Richard Spika v. The Village of Lombard, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Reeves v. SteinfeldtCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  3. Harry v. Weber County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  4. Taylor Ex Rel. Taylor v. Ogden City School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  5. Miller v. Basic Research, LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API