Legal Opinion

Lukich v. Utah Construction Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1916No. 2904PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Eon. C. W. Morse, Judge. Action by Niko Lukich against the Utah Construction Company, a corporation. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

This is the second appeal in this ease. Lukich v. Utah Const. Co., 46 Utah 317, 150 Pac. 298.

The first appeal, upon respondent’s motion, was dismissed upon the sole ground that it was premature; that is, it was brought before final judgment had been duly entered in the case. After the former appeal was dismissed a judgment was duly entered and a motion is how interposed by the respondent to dismiss this appeal: (1) Because the District Court had lost jurisdiction to enter judgment; (2) that no final judgment appears in the printed abstract; and (3) that .the assignments of error do not appear…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burnett v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Brady v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Edwards v. HellingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. In re Estate of ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Shephard v. BrentonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Norville v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Adamson Et Ux. v. BrockbankUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Fuller-Toponce Truck Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Ricks v. BudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Yusky v. Chief Consol. Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API