Legal Opinion

Robert v. Greenberg

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 2011No. B226064PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

Abraham Lincoln once said, “He who represents himself has a fool for a client.” Here, the client is an attorney who represented himself in the trial court. He now represents himself on appeal. He is unschooled on the basics of appellate law, suggesting that Lincoln’s observation applies on appeal. We understand that emotions run high in family law litigation and that this may cloud the judgment of a party. But this does not excuse the filing of a “creative” (i.e., misleading or incomplete or inaccurate) income and expense declaration; or perjury, as referenced by the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Salehi v. Surfside III Condominium Owners Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Parker v. HarbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Oliverez v. Oliverez (In re Oliverez), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Rich v. ThatcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. County of Kern v. JadwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API