Rich v. Thatcher
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, Acting P. J.
The United States Supreme Court has said: “ ‘[T]he custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom include preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor hinder.’ ” (Troxel v. Granville (2000) 530 U.S. 57, 65-66 [147 L.Ed.2d 49, 56-57, 120 S.Ct. 2054] (plur. opn.).) As we shall explain, “first” means first. A fit parent has a federal due process constitutional right to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of his or her child. (530 U.S. at pp. 57, 58, 62.) This includes the right…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. S.M.California Supreme Court · 2004
- HUONG QUE, INC. v. LuuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chalmers v. HirschkopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Ed H. v. Ashley C., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Ian J. v. Peter M.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- J.M. v. G.H. CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Marriage of Rubtsov and Rubtsova CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.