Legal Opinion

Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 3, 1990No. 1 CA-IC 88-148PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

GERBER, Judge.

This action involves a dispute between successive workers’ compensation carriers of a single employer. The administrative law judge (A.L.J.) concluded that a fall resulting when respondent employee (claimant) stepped backwards off an approximately one foot high platform was a compensable new injury even though a preexisting weakness predisposed him to fall when doing normal weight-bearing activity. The award imposed liability on the new injury carrier (Industrial Indemnity). The A.L.J. also determined that Industrial Indemnity was responsible for the August…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Pearce Development v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Salt River Project v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Arellano v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kaibab Industries v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. Montgomery v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Southwest Gas Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. Samaritan Health Services v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API