Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 23, 1992No. 1 CA-IC 90-163PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Presiding Judge.

This is a special action review of an Arizona Industrial Commission award denying compensability for Lyme disease. Four issues are presented on review: (1) whether the Administrative Law Judge erred by finding that the commonalty rule precluded compensability; (2) whether the positional risk doctrine mandated compensability; (3) whether the quantum theory of work-connection precluded compensability; and (4) whether the petitioner employee’s (“claimant’s”) injury constituted an occupational disease. We conclude that the Ad ministrative Law Judge erroneously…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Scheller v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. Toto v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Treadway v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Buczynski v. Industrial Commission of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  2. Pressley v. Southwestern Freight LinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Bergmann Precision, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Hypl v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. Bird v. Somerset Hills Country ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API