Montgomery v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Presiding Judge.
This is a special action review of an Arizona Industrial Commission award denying compensability for Lyme disease. Four issues are presented on review: (1) whether the Administrative Law Judge erred by finding that the commonalty rule precluded compensability; (2) whether the positional risk doctrine mandated compensability; (3) whether the quantum theory of work-connection precluded compensability; and (4) whether the petitioner employee’s (“claimant’s”) injury constituted an occupational disease. We conclude that the Ad ministrative Law Judge erroneously…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Scheller v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Toto v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Treadway v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Buczynski v. Industrial Commission of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- Pressley v. Southwestern Freight LinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Bergmann Precision, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Hypl v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Bird v. Somerset Hills Country ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.