Legal Opinion
Dixie Terminal Co. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 1, 1936No. 967PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The motion to dismiss the certificate is granted and the certificate is dismissed. Jewell v. Knight, 123 U. S. 426, 433; Cross v. Evans, 167 U. S. 60, 63; B. & O. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 215. U. S. 216, 221; United States v. Mayer, 235 U. S. 55, 66; Larabee Flour Mills Co. v. First National Bank of Dublin, 290 U. S. 594; Mantle Lamp Co. v. Aluminum Products Co., 297 U. S. 638; Smith, Collector v. Ajax Pipe Line Co., ante, p. 641. Solicitor General Reed for the United States in support of the motion. Messrs. Charles P. Taft and Robert A. Taft for Dixie Terminal Co.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Triplett v. LowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Jewell v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Cross v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Larabee Flour Mills Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
3Cited by4 opinions
- Montjoy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Logan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937