Legal Opinion
Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1940No. 8151PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The judgment assailed by the appeal is one dismissing a suit to recover for occupational diseases allegedly contracted by the appellant while employed in the glass factory of the appellee. The motion to dismiss was sustained on the ground that the petition failed to state a cause of action cognizable under Ohio law against an employer complying with the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Ohio General Code, Section 1465-70.
It was conceded at the outset that when the judgment was rendered, decisions of the courts of Ohio were contrary to the contentions of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Laramie Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- C. Blake McDowell, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
- C. Blake McDowell, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978