John v. . Allen
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Staoy, 0. J.
Tbe statutes under which the plaintiff seeks to compel the issuance of a voucher and the levy of a tax, chs. 88 and 361, Public-Local Laws 1933, deal only with county vouchers and county obligations. The application for writs of mandamus was, therefore, properly denied. Rollins v. Rogers, 204 N. C., 308, 168 S. E., 206; Comrs. v. Lacy, 174 N. C., 141, 93 S. E., 482.
Mandamus is available against a board of county commissioners only to compel the board to do something which it is its duty to do without it. The writ confers no new authority. The party seeking it must have a clear…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commissioners of Johnston County v. LacySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Commissioners v. . State TreasurerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Powers v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Rollins v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harris v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- White v. . Comrs. of JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Mears v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.