Legal Opinion
State v. Schmidt
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided March 8, 1995No. 03-94-00032-CVPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POWERS, Justice.
The State of Texas appeals from a judgment rendered in its statutory condemnation proceeding against Leon Schmidt, Trustee, and others. The trial court adjudged all costs against the State and the sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in this respect. We will affirm the judgment.
THE CONTROVERSY
Before the State filed the condemnation proceeding, it offered the property owners $281,880 in an attempt to agree on the damages. See Tex.Prop.Code Ann. § 21.047(a) (West 1984). The owners rejected the offer. In the special commissioners hearing that followed, that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commissioners Court of Caldwell County v. Criminal District AttorneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Anderson v. Clajon Gas Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
- Brinton v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Buzzard v. Mapco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Lapsley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- Marburger v. Seminole Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- Mercier v. MidTexas Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Cusack Ranch Corp. v. MidTexas Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.