Legal Opinion

Bryan v. Thos. Best & Sons, Inc.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided July 20, 1982PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TEASE, Judge.

In this personal injury action based upon the alleged manufacturing defects in an automatic bale wagon, Bryan demands that the defendant Sperry Corporation, T/A Sperry New Holland (Sperry) disclose its net worth, 1981 earnings, and its 1981 tax returns, in aid of Bryan’s claim for punitive damages. Sperry seeks a protective order, arguing that plaintiffs must first make a prima facie showing of their right to punitive damages.

Plaintiffs have alleged that Sperry negligently designed and manufactured the bale wagon at issue, and that it breached both express and implied…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Leidholt v. District Court in and for City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Reynolds v. WillisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  3. Riegel v. Aastad Ex Rel. AastadSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  4. Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1980
  5. Breault v. FriedliCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lunsford v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re Jacobs, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  3. Strauss v. BiggsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  4. Holman v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghSuperior Court of Delaware · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API