Legal Opinion

Breault v. Friedli

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 10, 1980PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Judge.

This interlocutory appeal is a case of first impression concerning the time and manner of discovery of a defendant’s financial condition in an action for punitive damages.

The underlying cause of action in this lawsuit arose out of the sale of a liquor store business to the plaintiffs, Robert and Barbara Breault, by the defendant owners, Ed Friedli and M. P. Sweeney. Defendants Bill Berkley and Jim Woolems, individually and d/b/a Berkley Realtor, acted as the agent for plaintiffs in negotiating and consummating the sale.

On February 28, 1979, the plaintiffs brought suit…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Sneed v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Cathey v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. Campen v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re Jacobs, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  4. Jerry Michael Gordon v. Doug Norman, Harold Prows, Ken Martin (85-5175), and J. Anderson (85-5186)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. Keith v. Murfreesboro Livestock Market, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API