Legal Opinion

Durham v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1979No. Civ. 54072PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.—

Darren Lamont Durham and his mother Dorothy Durham sued the Southern Pacific Transportation Company and the City of Los Angeles et al. for injuries suffered when Darren was trying to hop a railroad train near his home. A judgment of nonsuit was entered for the City of Los Angeles, and a judgment after jury trial was entered for defendant Southern Pacific Transportation Company and against plaintiff. Appellants appeal from the judgment of nonsuit and from the judgment for defendant Southern Pacific Transportation Company.

Contentions on Appeal

1. Civil Code section 1714.7 is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Smith v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. City of Los Angeles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Brenner v. City of El CajonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Sunseri v. Camperos Del Valle Stables, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. In Re Marriage of BeltranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API