Vitale v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether, on July 15, 2003, the service of legal process for an appeal from a decision of a municipal zoning board was governed by General Statutes (Rev. to 2003) § 8-8 (f) 1 or General Statutes (Rev. to 2003) § 52-57 (b) (5), as amended by No. 03-278, § 126, of the 2003 Public Acts (P.A. 03-278). 2 The plaintiffs, Michelle B. Vitale and Ronald Bolles, appeal 3 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their administrative appeal from the decision of the defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of Montville, for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Peters v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Fedus v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Metcalfe v. SandfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
3Cited by9 opinions
- R.C. Equity Group, LLC v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Abel v. PLANNING & ZON. COM'N OF NEW CANAANSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Caltabiano v. L & L Real Estate Holdings II, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Primus v. PLANNING COM'N OF SOUTHINGTONConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Sinoway Family Partnership v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Superior Court · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.