United States v. Kwang Fu Peng
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Information that came to light during the trial of this case presents this court with serious dilemmas. During the cross-examination of the government’s first witness, the defendant’s attorney made reference to a conference held at the defense attorney’s office involving the witness, the defendant, the attorney, and one of the attorney’s partners. The attorney therefore is a potential witness in the trial. This presents two problems. First, whether the defendant’s attorney must be disqualified pursuant to Rule 5-102 of the Disciplinary Rules of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Bernard McKeonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fognani v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- United States v. Kwang Fu Peng, A/K/A "k.f. Peng,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Paretti v. Cavalier Label Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Jan. 2, 1985District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Estate of Andrews Ex Rel. Andrews v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.