Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Jan. 2, 1985

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 11, 1985No. M-11-188 (DNE)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

605 F.Supp. 839 (1985)

In re GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DATED JANUARY 2, 1985 (Robert M. Simels, Esq.).

Donald PAYDEN, Intervenor,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.

No. M-11-188 (DNE).

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 11, 1985.

Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty., S.D. N.Y., So. Dist. of N.Y., John K. Carroll, Stuart E. Abrams, Rhea Kemble Brecher, Asst. U.S. Attys., New York City, of counsel, for respondent.

Obermaier, Morvillo & Abramowitz, P.C., Elkan Abramowitz,[*] New York City, of counsel, and Robert M. Simels, P.C., Robert M. Simels, New York City, of counsel, for…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Antonia Campos, Jose Campos, Milk-O-Mat, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Richard H. ThierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. PaydenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API