Estate of Andrews Ex Rel. Andrews v. United States
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAYNE, District Judge.
The issue before the court is whether counsel for plaintiff, the Estate of Virginia C. Andrews (“Estate”), should be disqualified from representing the Estate in this tax refund action when trial counsel’s law partner is a party to this action in his representative capacity as a co-executor of the Estate and when the partner will be a material witness at trial. For the reasons set forth below, the Estate’s counsel is disqualified from representing the Estate in this action.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
At the time of her death on December 19, 1986,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. American Gym, Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- International Electronics Corp. v. FlanzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- O'NEIL v. BerganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- General Mill Supply Company, Manual Rotenberg and Milton Rotenberg, Plaintiffs v. Sca Services, Inc., Hale and DorrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Caruso v. WixomCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Brown v. DanielDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1998
- United States v. PerryDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- Carta Ex Rel. Estate of Carta v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Litster Frost v. Idaho Injury Law GroupIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.