Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown v. Homestake Exploration Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1934No. 7,222Published

1DissentChief Justice Callaway

As I see it, this ease was tried, not upon the contract, but upon plaintiffs’ attempted interpretation of paragraph 10 thereof as pleaded in the complaint. The mooted paragraph reads: “One of the inducements to the parties of the second part to the making of this agreement is that the lands embraced within the terms of this agreement shall be drilled into production as rapidly as possible and the party of the first part hereby binds itself to the exercise of reasonable diligence in the drilling of oil wells on such premises, to such number and extent as said premises will admit of.”

After much…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ardizonne v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Sanford v. Gates, Townsend & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. McDaniel v. Hager-Stevenson Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Armington v. StelleMontana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Riddell v. Peck-Williamson Heating & Ventilating Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API