Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Hager-Stevenson Oil Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1926No. 5,796PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in two actions which were consolidated for the purpose of trial. We shall, for convenience, refer to these as the first and second actions.

In the first action plaintiff sought recovery of the sum of $1,017 with interest, claiming that sum as a balance due for work, labor and services in building a water reservoir upon plaintiff’s land for defendant. (The land was leased from plaintiff by defendant.) In its answer defendant admitted the employment of plaintiff and claimed the balance due to be $383 only. The defendant interposed a counterclaim based…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Wills v. Manufacturers N. Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Northwestern Oil & Gas Co. v. BranineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Glasgow v. Chartiers Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. McMillan v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Blodgett v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Homestake Exploration Corp. v. SchoreggeMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Berthelote v. Loy Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Long v. Magnolia Petroleum CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Brown v. Homestake Exploration Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Solberg v. Sunburst Oil & Gas Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API