Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Velez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 23, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 19, 1996, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she lost her employment due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from her employment as a legal secretary after she refused to accept assignments to work overtime. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that this constituted disqualifying misconduct. We affirm. It is undisputed that claimant accepted her position with the employer knowing that it would involve occasional overtime hours. The record…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of DavidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re the Claim of SabaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of MackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API