Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Sabater

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance *954Appeal Board, filed September 6, 1991, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant, a maintenance engineer, was fired when he refused to work periodically on the weekends. The evidence establishes that claimant was advised when he was hired that he would occasionally have to work weekends. Although he had done so in the past, claimant began to refuse to do weekend work when he did not receive the raise that he had expected.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of GrazioseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of VelezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re KennyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. In re the Claim of LanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re the Claim of GorlickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API