In re the Claim of David

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 25, 1994, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Our inquiry here is limited to whether the decision is supported by substantial evidence on the issue of disqualification for benefits due to misconduct (see, Labor Law § 593 [3]). What constitutes "good cause” for discharge within the meaning of Labor Law § 593 (3) is a question of fact within the province of the Board if its findings are supported by…