Legal Opinion
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 6, 2014No. Slip Op. 14-61; Court 14-00129PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KELLY, Judge:
Plaintiff Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.§. (“Plaintiff’ or “Borusan”) brings this action for a writ of mandamus compelling the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) to perform a verification in the ongoing countervailing duty investigation of Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From India and Turkey, 78 Fed.Reg. 45,502 (Dep’t Commerce July 29, 2013) (initiation of countervailing duty investigations) (“Investigation”), prior to Commerce’s issuance of the final determination. Plaintiff alleges jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i)(2) and (4) (2006), 1…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Nec Corporation and Hnsx Supercomputers, Inc. v. United States and Department of Commerce, and Cray Research, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- M S Int'l v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Coal. for Fair Trade in Garlic v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.' Coal. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014