Waring v. Moore
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
McLEESE, Associate Judge:
This case presents the question whether a taxicab involved in an accident was “uninsured” under District of Columbia law, thereby triggering uninsured-vehicle coverage. The trial court concluded that the taxicab at issue was not “uninsured.” We reverse.
I
The parties do not dispute the following facts. While driving a vehicle insured by AIG, Ms. Waring was involved in an accident with a taxicab driven by Mr. Moore. Ms. Waring initially filed a claim with Mr. Moore’s insurance company, which disclaimed coverage for the incident on the ground that Mr. Moore had failed to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- District of Columbia v. PlaceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Northbrook Insurance Co. v. United Services Automobile Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Omaha Indemnity Co. v. Pall, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Allstate Insurance v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Home Insurance v. Williams Ex Rel. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.