Legal Opinion

Waring v. Moore

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 2013No. 12-CV-0556Published

1Opinion of the Court

McLEESE, Associate Judge:

This case presents the question whether a taxicab involved in an accident was “uninsured” under District of Columbia law, thereby triggering uninsured-vehicle coverage. The trial court concluded that the taxicab at issue was not “uninsured.” We reverse.

I

The parties do not dispute the following facts. While driving a vehicle insured by AIG, Ms. Waring was involved in an accident with a taxicab driven by Mr. Moore. Ms. Waring initially filed a claim with Mr. Moore’s insurance company, which disclaimed coverage for the incident on the ground that Mr. Moore had failed to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. PlaceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Northbrook Insurance Co. v. United Services Automobile Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Omaha Indemnity Co. v. Pall, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Allstate Insurance v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Home Insurance v. Williams Ex Rel. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API