Harrison v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Claimant, having suffered a compensable injury, contends that he is permanently and totally disabled. The referee and the Board disagreed and the trial judge found for the claimant. Our review of the record leads us to the conclusion that claimant failed to prove his contention by a preponderance of the evidence. The Board’s order sets forth most of the essential facts. It reads in pertinent part:

"The claimant has requested Board review contending he is entitled to an award of permanent total disability.

"Claimant was injured October 19, 1972, while employed as a concrete finisher. At the time…