Williams v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Petitioner State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) seeks reversal of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) order affirming a referee’s finding that claimant is suffering from an occupational disease. SAIF argues that claimant has not established by a preponderance of the evidence that he is suffering from disease arising "out of and in the scope of * * * employment.” ORS 656.802(l)(a). Upon a de novo review of the entire record, we find that claimant’s burden has not been met.
Claimant alleges that he is suffering from psychological disorders as a result of the atmosphere existing in the Civil…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Civil Rights Division of Bureau of Labor v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Kinney v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Friesen v. Gould, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Civil Rights Division of Bureau of Labor v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Williams v. Civil Rights DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Knoetzel v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Knoetzel v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. GygiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. GygiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982