Legal Opinion

Williams v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 18, 1978No. WCB No. 76-4573, CA 10466PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Petitioner State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) seeks reversal of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) order affirming a referee’s finding that claimant is suffering from an occupational disease. SAIF argues that claimant has not established by a preponderance of the evidence that he is suffering from disease arising "out of and in the scope of * * * employment.” ORS 656.802(l)(a). Upon a de novo review of the entire record, we find that claimant’s burden has not been met.

Claimant alleges that he is suffering from psychological disorders as a result of the atmosphere existing in the Civil…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Civil Rights Division of Bureau of Labor v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Kinney v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Friesen v. Gould, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. Civil Rights Division of Bureau of Labor v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Williams v. Civil Rights DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Knoetzel v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Knoetzel v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. GygiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. GygiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API