Legal Opinion

People v. Rells

California Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2000No. S080451PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We granted review to resolve an important issue under the law that governs inquiry into the mental competence of a defendant in a criminal prosecution.

For a trial of a defendant’s mental competence, Penal Code section 1369 establishes a presumption that the defendant is mentally competent unless he is proved by a preponderance of the evidence to be otherwise. In so doing, it operates to impose the burden of proof on the party, if any, who claims that the defendant is mentally incompetent, and fixes the weight thereof at preponderance of the evidence.

The question that we shall…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Cooper v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. R.V.California Supreme Court · 2015
  2. People v. BeesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. People v. Kaufman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Thompson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. Jackson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API