Legal Opinion

People v. R.V.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2015No. S212346PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.

A minor who is the subject of a wardship petition under Welfare and Institutions Code1 section 601 or section 602 has, like an adult facing criminal prosecution, a due process right not to be tried while mentally incompetent. Section 709 establishes procedures for juvenile courts to follow so as to ensure that minors are not subject to adjudication while their competency is impaired.

We decide two issues in this case; first, whether under section 709 a minor is presumed competent and bears the burden of proving otherwise by a preponderance of the evidence and,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Atkins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Eisen v. Tavangarian, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API