Legal Opinion

Moore v. Lederle Laboratories

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1972No. Docket 10771PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, P. J.

The present appeal requires a determination of a party’s right to object to testimony contained in a deposition offered at trial and is precipitated by the following sequence of events.

Within nine weeks from birth, plaintiff was diagnosed as having the disease cystic fibrosis. He received curative and preventive treatment by the intermittent administration of two antibiotic drugs manufactured by defendant until being placed upon different drugs in 1964. As a consequence of this treatment, plaintiffs teeth became permanently stained blue-black in color and structurally damaged. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Banaszkiewicz v. BaunMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Nutterville v. McLamIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Schalkofski v. LawrenceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Koenig v. Lake Shore, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Webb Coal Co. v. Bay City School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bonelli v. Volkswagen of America, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Moore v. Lederle LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Willerick v. HanshalliMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Howell v. KingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Liliya Komendat v. Andrew GiffordMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API