Legal Opinion

Willerick v. Hanshalli

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1984No. Docket 73259PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackenzie, P.J.

In this paternity action, defendant appeals as of right from an order of filiation entered by the trial court after a jury had determined that defendant is the father of plaintiffs daughter. The sole issue before us is whether the trial court erred in admitting the depositional testimony of Dr. Kately and an exhibit relating the results of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) blood test, which results indicated a 95.1 percent likelihood that defendant was the father. Defendant argues on appeal, as he did below, that plaintiff had not laid a sufficient foundation for the admission of this evidence.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lessenhop v. NortonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. Mason v. LovinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Gard v. Michigan Produce HaulersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Bauer v. VeithMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. People v. CordsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kofford Ex Rel. Utah State Department of Social Services v. FloraUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Zyskowski v. HabelmannMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Lyle v. EddyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. Camden v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Burnside v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API