Legal Opinion
Howell v. King
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 8, 1977No. Docket 28544PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, C. J.
Plaintiffs sought to recover for injuries sustained in an intersectional automobile collision. The Secretary of State, as Director of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund, intervened as a party defendant. The jury returned a verdict of no cause of action, and after denial of their motion for new trial plaintiffs claimed appeal.
Witness Quillen testified that as he turned east on to Nine Mile Road defendant’s car also turned and passed him on the curb side accelerating at "full force”. He testified that heavy rainfall limited visibility to about one block, and that he was driving at 33 to 37…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Durbin v. K-K-M Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Knickerbocker v. SamsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Moore v. Lederle LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Wilson v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Moore v. Lederle LaboratoriesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Russell v. OgilvieMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978