Legal Opinion

Bristol v. Rasmussen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1996No. S-94-085PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff-appellant Donald Bristol appeals the judgment of the district court, which reversed a county court judgment in his favor. The county court, in a bench trial, found that the destruction of 10 acres of growing soybeans on Bristol’s land was proximately caused by flooding, resulting from defendant-appellee Eric Rasmussen’s downstream obstruction of Indian Creek, and awarded damages to Bristol.

Rasmussen cross-appeals the judgment of the district court, because it ostensibly lets stand the county court ruling that Rasmussen’s obstruction was the proximate cause of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schuessler v. Benchmark Marketing & Consulting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Lone Cedar Ranches, Inc. v. JandebeurNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ashland State Bank v. Elkhorn Racquetball, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Hill v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Cover v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. World Radio Laboratories, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Pribil v. KoinzanNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Four R Cattle Co. v. MullinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Reiser v. CoburnNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Seeber v. HowletteNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API