Bristol v. Rasmussen
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff-appellant Donald Bristol appeals the judgment of the district court, which reversed a county court judgment in his favor. The county court, in a bench trial, found that the destruction of 10 acres of growing soybeans on Bristol’s land was proximately caused by flooding, resulting from defendant-appellee Eric Rasmussen’s downstream obstruction of Indian Creek, and awarded damages to Bristol.
Rasmussen cross-appeals the judgment of the district court, because it ostensibly lets stand the county court ruling that Rasmussen’s obstruction was the proximate cause of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Schuessler v. Benchmark Marketing & Consulting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Lone Cedar Ranches, Inc. v. JandebeurNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Ashland State Bank v. Elkhorn Racquetball, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Hill v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Cover v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- World Radio Laboratories, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Pribil v. KoinzanNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Four R Cattle Co. v. MullinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Reiser v. CoburnNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Seeber v. HowletteNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.