Legal Opinion

Finlay Straus, Inc. v. University of State of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

The regents have express power to supervise the practice of the profession of optometry. (Education Law, § 51, subd. 1.) The “ supervision ” of such a profession, related to the public health, would usually be construed to embrace reasonable control over the method of attracting patronage, including advertising. Were this in doubt, the language, of section 1433 of the Education Law makes it quite clear that the subject of advertising in the practice of this profession was to be regulated by the regents, since advertising “ in violation’of rules to be made by the department ” is prohibited.

When…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kee v. BaberTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Finlay Straus, Inc. v. University of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  4. Dubin v. Board of RegentsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  5. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API